"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?" 2 Corinthians 6:14

Contents: From Darwin to Lenin Evolution & Nazi Germany Was Adolf Hitler a Christian? Evolution in the USA Evolution, Women, and Family Evolution and One-World Government

What you believe determines how you behave. The worldview we have determines how we behave in everything we do: what we eat, where we work, what we do for recreation, how we treat others, etc. When students are taught they are nothing more than random chemicals that washed up on the beach by random chance, that is exactly how they will interpret everything around them.

In this article, we'll see how many of the destructive actions of those in the last 150 years have held the evolution religion as their worldview.





There is a clear link between Darwin and many genocidal dictators in the past 150 years. The philosophical ties are almost never connected together in any public school textbook. For example, let's take a look at Darwin to Lenin:

1) Charles Darwin publishes The Origin of Species in 1859. 2) Karl Marx reads Darwin's The Origin of Species. Based on Darwin's ideas, Karl Marx publishes Das Kapital (1867) and tries to dedicate his book to Charles Darwin.

"Darwin's book on Natural Selection... is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view."

-Karl Marx, letter to Friedrich Engels 1860, quoted by Conway Zirkle, Evolution: Marxian Biology and the Social Scene, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959, p. 85-87; See also Ted Honderich, On Political Means and Social Ends, Edinburgh University Press, 2003, p. 65, ISBN: 9780748618408

At Marx's funeral, Friedrich Engels (who supported and funded Marx) gave a speech. He stated:
"Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history;"
-Friedrich Engles, quoted by Philip Foner, Karl Marx Remembered: Comments at the Time of His Death, SanFrancisco: Synthesis, 1983, p. 39, ISBN: 9780899350202

3) Vladimir Lenin reads Marx's Das Kapital. Based on Marx's ideas, Vladimir Lenin publishes The State and Revolution (1867), where he studies and praises Marx. "Marx makes a sober estimate of exactly how socialist society will have to manage its affairs. Marx proceeds to make a concrete analysis of the conditions of life of a society in which there will be no capitalism," -Vladimir Lenin, The State and Revolution, reprint Kessinger Publishing, 2004, p. 78, ISBN: 9781419183478

4) Millions perish under Lenin's communist rule.
(See R. Rummel, Death by Government, Transaction Publishers, 1997, p. 24, ISBN: 9781560009276; See also Ronald Hamowy, The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism, published SAGE, 2008, p. 82, ISBN: 9781412965804)

Though some may think it far too simple to make these statements, I urge those who doubt this claim to read the works of Darwin, Marx, and Lenin, so you can see the connection for yourself. If public schools began to teach the truth about the evolutionary foundations of genocidal, communist nations, students may begin to have a disgusted outlook on evolution, and that would be a hindrance to the huamnist agenda.

nazi: a member of the national socialist German workers' party, which in 1933, under Adolf Hitler, seized political control of the country, suppressing all opposition and establishing a dictatorship over all cultural, economic, and political activities of the people, and promulgated belief in the supremacy of Hitler as Führer, aggressive anti-Semitism, the natural supremacy of the German people, and the establishment of Germany by superior force as a dominant world power
(See 'nazi', Random House Dictionary, Random House Inc, 2010; See also Collins English Dictionary, 10th Edition, William Collins Sons & Co, 2009)

Adolf Hitler, leader of the Nazis in 1930s, was an incredibly charismatic speaker who was able to rally the German people together with the best of intentions. Unfortunately, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Hitler developed an evolution-based, racist "hitlist" that catagorized different groups of people by their "evolutionary progress." (See James Rhodes, The Hitler Movement: A Millenarian Revolution, Hoover Institution Press, 1980, p. 107, ISBN: 0-8179-7131-9)

Hitler wrote of this evolutionary "selection" process:

"Nature herself... intervenes to restrict the increase of population of certain countries or races... She diminishes... the conservation of the procreated... with the result that all those who are less strong and less healthy are forced back into the womb of the eternal unknown. Those whom she permits to survive... [are] well adapted to procreate-in turn, in order that the process of thoroughgoing selection may begin again from the beginning. By thus brutally proceeding against the individual and immediately calling him back to herself as soon as he shows himself unequal to the storm of life, she keeps the race and species strong, in fact, raises them to the highest accomplishments. At the same time the diminution of number strengthens the individual and thus in the last analysis fortifies the species."

-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, published Houghton Mifflin, 1971, Chapter 4, ISBN: 9780395083628; See also Richard M. Lerner, Final Solutions: Biology, Prejudice, and Genocide, Penn State Press, 2008, p. 70, ISBN: 9780271028026

Then Hitler altered Germany's law, and used the courts and police to enforce his ideals:
"[Nazi Germany] itself has refused to recognize Jews living in Germany as 'persons' in the legal sense. In a decision of June 27, 1936 the highest German court condemned German Jews to 'civil death.'"
-Ernst Fraenkel, The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship, translated E. Shils & E. Lowenstein, published Lawbook Exchange Ltd, 2006, ISBN: 9781584776710

Hitler and the Nazi's ultimate goal was to strengthen the German people by eliminating the weakest, and allowing only the strong to breed. This is exactly in line with the philosophy one gets from Charles Darwin's writings:

"With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment... Thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care... leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed."

-Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, published D. Appleton & Co, 1871, p. 161-162

Some evolutionists will object to the quotation, claiming that Darwin thought this kind of action was evil, when he stated: "but if we were intentionally to neglect the weak and helpless, it could only be for a contingent benefit, with an overwhelming present evil." However, this begs the question, "What is evil?" In the evolution worldview, there is no such thing as evil, and Darwin could only speculate evil from his own opinions, not from any logical reason.
(Read Everything You Need To Know About Atheism here at creationliberty.com for more details)

A logical question is then raised: "Is killing off the weaker members of society wrong?" Most evolutionists have not carefully thought out the philosophical implications of this question from within their worldview. Scientific American, for example, correctly says that Darwin considered killing off weaker members of society to be an evil act, but they incorrectly conclude that because Darwin did not say it was evil, therefore Hitler could not use evolution philosophy to reach that conclusion.
(See John Rennie & Steve Mirsky, Scientific American, "Six Things in Expelled That Ben Stein Doesn't Want You to Know," www.scientificamerican.com, April 16, 2008, retrieved Dec 15, 2010)

The evolution-based philosophy was the central theme for many of the actions of Hitler and the Third Reich:





Shocking as it may sound, there are some atheists/evolutionists, and even some Jews out there, claiming Hitler was a Christian.
(See Lee Strobel, The Case for Faith, published Zondervan, 2009, ISBN: 9780310565703)

Those making this claim often quote the following from Hitler:
"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."
-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, published Houghton Mifflin, 1971, Chapter 2, ISBN: 9780395083628

Others will claim that Hitler was a Christian because he was raised a Catholic. This creates a couple of problems:
1) Catholicism is assumed to be Christianity. This is not the case. Just because they have a "bible" and a church, does not make them Christians. Just saying they are Christians doesn't make them Christians either. (Self-proclaimed identity proves nothing.)
(Read Corruptions of Christianity: Roman Catholicism here at creationliberty.com for more details)
2) Because Hitler was raised Catholic and writes a sentence that includes "Almighty Creator", that does NOT automatically make him a Christian. It also does not imply that he is even referring to Christianity. Even if Hitler were to state, "I am a born-again Christian," that does not make it true. There are many people today claiming to be Christians, but are not.

Should we make judgments of someone's religious beliefs by what they tell us?
Or should we judge them based on the evidence of their actions?

Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
-Matthew 7:20

When reading Mein Kampf, Hitler's racist and evolutionary beliefs are very clear. Some have argued that Hitler mentioned the living God in Mein Kampf, which is true, but the context in which he uses it, references nothing to his true belief system. In addition, Hitler also mentions other strange 'gods' in the following quotes:
"While the Goddess of Suffering took me in her arms..."
"...the gods had willed Austria's destruction."
"...the inexorable hand of the Goddess of Destiny begins to weigh peoples..."
-Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, published Houghton Mifflin, 1971, Chapter 2-5, ISBN: 9780395083628

After reading these, do you wonder why we don't hear about Hitler's belief in pagan gods and goddesses, which is idolatry in direct violation to Christianity? The reason most people don't hear about this is because there is ample effort to blame Hitler's genocide on Christianity.

Generally, the atheists and evolutionists do not discern a Christian based on the evidence, but rather, they base a Christian on whether or not a person says they are a Christian. Instead of looking for the evidence, they are just taking someone's word for it. Not only can we properly judge Hitler's actions in a foundation of evolution, but his hatred for Christianity rivals only that of atheists/humanists today:

"Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery..." "The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity." "The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity... Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things."

-Adolf Hitler, quoted by H.R. Trevor-Roper, Hitler's Table Talk 1941-1944: His Private Conversations, translated Norman Cameron & R.H. Stevens, published Enigma Books, 2002, ISBN: 9781929631063; See also Ray Comfort, How to Know God Exists: Scientific Proof of God, published Bridge Logos Foundation, 2008, p. 146, ISBN: 9780882704326

Hitler, in his delusion, may have honestly believed he was sent by God to exterminate the Jews, but we know two things for sure:
1) He believed in evolution and used that philosophy to justify his actions.
2) He hated Christians and Christianity in general.

The actions (fruits) Hitler carried out against the Jews is in direct violation to Biblical Scripture. He can't be a Christian and do what he did. Simply claiming Christianity does not make one a Christian by default. As I've told the evolutionists countless times: Believing something doesn't make true automatically.

However, Hitler knew he could use the Catholic church to his advantage.

Hitler's intention was to use the Catholic church for his own political gain. Photographs like this, with a cross over Hitler's head, were taken and published in the newspapers to make him seem like a man of God, working for the German people under divine authority. Many people think this was "accidental" or "forced cooperation" by the Catholic church, but that is not the case. The Catholic church not only knew what was happening, but supported the Hitler's Nazi movement:

"Article 16 - Before bishops take possession of their dioceses they are to take an oath of fealty either to the Reich representative of the state concerned, or to the President of the Reich, according to the following formula: Before God and on the Holy Gospels I swear and promise, as becomes a bishop, loyalty to the German Reich and to the State of... I swear and promise to honor the legally constituted government and to cause the clergy of my diocese to honor it. In the performance of my spiritual office and in my solicitude for the welfare and the interests of the German Reich, I will endeavor to avoid all detrimental acts which might endanger it."

-Concordat between Hitler and the Vatican of 1933, Controversial Concordats, edited Frank J. Coppa, CUA Press, 1999, p. 209, ISBN: 9780813209203; See also J.F. Maclear, Church and State in the Modern Age: A Documentary History, Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 388, ISBN: 9780195086812

The churches were converted to contain Nazi alters:

"A joint pastoral letter [from all the German bishops] was read from the pulpits... Jan 3, 1937 [stating that] "the German bishops consider it their duty to support the head of the German Reich by all those means which the Chruch has at its disposal... We must mobilize all the spiritual and moral forces of the Church in order to strengthen confidence in the Fuehrer."

-Guenter Lewy, The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany, Da Capo Press, 2000, p. 209, ISBN: 978030680931

With the pope's support, Hitler could operate at full-steam by enslaving the Jews to get as much out of them as he could before they were executed. For example, the Nuremberg theatre was constructed by Jewish slaves, forced to work 12 hours a day lifting heavy stones slabs, and if someone fell, they would be killed, carried off, and replaced with another.

"For us, this [concerning Jews] is not a problem you can turn a blind eye to-one to be solved by small concessions. For us, it is a problem of whether our nation can ever recover its health, whether the Jewish spirit can ever really be eradicated. Don't be misled into thinking you can fight a disease without killing the carrier, without destroying the bacillus... This Jewish contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end, until the carrier himself, the Jew, has been banished from our midst." (applause from crowd)

-Adolf Hitler in a public speech, The War Path: Hitler's Germany 1933-1939, Viking Press, 1978, p.xxiii, ISBN: 9780670749713

We could talk for hours about the horrible things the Nazis did under Hitler's reign of terror, but the point is that these actions can only be justified by the horrific philosophy that evolution provides. "There is a difference between those who look upon their fellow human beings as common creatures of a common creator and those who look upon them as a conglomerate of biologicals and chemicals."
-Dr. Leo Alexander, Jewish survivor of the holocaust, quoted by Steve Rabey, Faith Under Fire: Stories of Hope and Courage from World War II, published Thomas Nelson Inc, 2002, p. 127, ISBN: 9780785265597

Evolutionists often talk about one animal killing another to propagate its species, but they will not apply that same philosophy to mankind, and shun conversation about the historical instances where it has been pragmatically applied.

Is evolution the source of racism? Absolutely not. Racism has been around for thousands of years. However, Darwin's books simply added fuel to the fire by giving a justification for racist thought and action, while the Bible teaches differently:

And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
-Act 17:26

Though he could not tell what destruction his religious theory of evolution would bring, Charles Darwin's words, though often hidden, should be echoing down the corridors of history: "The support which I receive from Germany is my chief ground for hoping that our views will ultimately prevail." -Charles Darwin, quoted by Sir Francis Darwin, The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Vol. 2, published D. Appleton & Company, 1888, p. 270

"When I came back to my native country, after all the stories about Hitler, I couldn't ride in the front of the bus... I had to go to the back door. I wasn't invited to shake hands with Hitler, but I wasn't invited to the White House to shake hands with the President either."

-Jessie Owens, won the most gold medals in the 1936 Olympics held in Germany, quoted by David G. McComb, Sports in World History, Psychology Press, 2004, p. 84, ISBN: 9780415318129; See also Jacqueline Edmondson, Jesse Owens: A Biography, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007, p. 37, ISBN: 9780313339882

As I pointed out earlier, racism has been around a long time before Darwin's books were published, but The Origin of Species and The Descent of Man threw buckets of fuel onto an already raging fire. At the St. Loius World's Fair in 1904, people from different cultures were brought from around the world to put on display as evidence for evolution, purposefully trying to dress and position them in such a way that showed off their "un-evolved intellect" and "savage manner." (Picture: Anthropologist W.J. McGee in the middle with collected "primitive" peoples, Peter Jennings, The Century for Young People by ABC)

One of the people put on display was a pygmy named Ota Benga. He was taken away from his wife and two children, and put display in a cage with chimpanzees as evidence for evolution. Evolutionist Dr. William T. Hornaday, the capturer of Ota Benga and director of the zoo, delivered long speeches about how he was proud of having such a precious transitional form. (i.e. Ota was a missing link in the evolutionary monkey-to-man model) He was promised, after the display was over, he would be returned home, but the evolutionists lied. Ota wondered from place to place until 1916 when, out of depression, he stole a revolver and killed himself. (See Phillips V. Bradford & Harvey Blume, Ota Benga, published Bookman, 1993, ISBN: 9781863950220; See also Cynthia Crossen, "How Pygmy Ota Benga Ended Up in Bronx Zoo," Wall Street Journal, post-gazette.com, Feb 6, 2006, retrieved Dec 18, 2010)

"A New South Wales missionary was a horrified witness to the slaughter by mounted police of a group of dozens of Aboriginal men, women, and children. Forty-five heads were then boiled down and the 10 best skulls were packed off for overseas."

-Creation Ex Nihilo Magazine, March Issue, 1996; See also Marilyn Oakley, I Was Blind But Now I See Evolution, published Lulu.com, 2007, p. 51, ISBN: 9780615151601

The Australian Aboriginies were also victims of the evolutionary philosophy. The Aboriginies travel light and often, never carrying heavy tools with them, so they use their teeth as a vice to clamp down on bark, or other materials, to make things they need. As muscles get bigger, so do the bones, and this works the same way in the jaw. Because they had bigger jaw bones, American evolutionists wanted their skulls to put on display in museums as the missing link in the evolutionary chain.

The evolution philosophy Hitler held in the 1930s was only one part of a whole. The idea of "selective breeding" for evolutionary purposes was also held strongly by some people in the USA. One of our presidents, Theodore Roosevelt, held this view:

"I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding... Criminals should be sterilized and feeble-minded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them... The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed." -Theodore Roosevelt, quoted by Joshua D. Hawley, Theodore Roosevelt: Preacher of Righteousness, Yale University Press, 2008, p. 246, ISBN: 9780300120103

This is not a Christian concept, as the Bible lineages show good men coming out of wicked parents. So where do these ideas come from? This evolution-based concept, held and practiced by Germans, Japanese, and Americans alike (as well as many other countries), is called eugenics.

eugenics: the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits
(See 'eugenics', Random House Dictionary, Random House Inc, 2010; See also Collins English Dictionary, 10th Edition, William Collins Sons & Co, 2009)

Many states had institutions that promoted and practiced euginics. In the 1920s, "Fitter Families" was an institution that held eugenics competitions in Georgia, Arkansas, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Kansas, Michigan, and Texas to see who could get the most perfectly evolved breed of human. "[W]inners at the 1925 Kansas Fair competition, for example, were paraded around in automobiles under lavishly decorated banners emblazoned 'Kansas Best Crop.'"
-Christine Rosen, Preaching Eugenics: Religious Leaders and the American Euginics Movement, Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 113, ISBN: 9780195156799

Schools set up classes for college students to take to get college credit in eugenics.

Carrie Buck was one of many thousands of Americans were sterilized during the eugenics movement in the early 20th century. Carrie was labeled as "feeble-minded" by her family. When Carrie was 17-years old, she was found to be pregnant. She told her family that she was raped their nephew, but no one believed her and she was committed to an institution for the retarded, even though upon closer inspection, there was nothing wrong with her.

"As for Carrie, when I met her she was reading newspapers daily and joining a more literate friend to assist at regular bouts with the crossword puzzles. She was not a sophisticated woman, and lacked social graces, but mental health professionals who examined her in later life confirmed my impressions that she was neither mentally ill nor retarded."
-Paul A. Lombardo, leading scholar of Buck vs. Bell quoted by Stephen Jay Gould in Carol C. Donley & Sheryl Buckley's book, What's Normal? Narratives of Mental & Emotional Disorders, Kent State University Press, 2000, p. 35, ISBN: 9780873386531
Carrie Buck was later put on trial and sentenced to be sterilized so she could not longer breed any more of her "disfunctional kind." After an unjust trial of analyzation of Carrie, her mother, and her newborn daughter to all three be imbeciles, an almost unanimous decision was made by the Supreme Court, and a statement was given by US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes:

"We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the state for these such lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be much by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes... Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
-US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, quoted by G. Edward White, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the Inner Self, Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 405, ISBN: 9780195101287

Planned Parenthood, just like the ACLU, is a deceptive organization with a deceptive name. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, started the organization to promote eugenics and held many of the same views as Hitler, straight from evolution philosophy:

"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." -Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, Woman and the New Race, Truth Publishing Company, 1920, p. 63 "I cannot refrain from saying that women must come to recognize there is some function of womanhood other than being a child-bearing machine." -Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, What Every Girl Should Know, published Belvedere, 1980, ISBN: 9780877542193

"More children from the fit, less from the unfit--that is the chief aim of birth control."
-Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood quoted by James T. Bennett, Tax-Funded Politics, Transaction Publishers, 2004, p. 34 ISBN: 9780765802354; See also Richard Lynn, Eugenics: A Reassessment, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001, p. 33, ISBN: 9780275958220

"To apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population who progeny is already tainted... to apportion farm lands and homesteads for these segregated persons where they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives..."
-Margaret Sanger, "Plan of Peace," Birth Control Review, p. 107-108, 1932

Her ideas of eliminating the "inferior races" was obvious, creating what she called the "Negro Project":
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population... [in case] it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
-Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood quoted by Jonah Goldberg, Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning, published Random House Inc, 2007, p. 273 ISBN: 9780385511841

Jesus warned the mothers of Israel this was going to happen:

But Jesus turning unto them said, Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children. For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.
-Luke 23:28-29

"[R]egardless of the 'Johnson & Johnson' commercials... the fetus is a parasite upon the woman's body!"
-Adrienne Zurub, The Parasitic Nature of Pregnancy, Ezine Articles, ezinearticles.com, published Oct 1, 2007, retrieved Dec 22, 2010

"[T]he baby is a parasite. [referring to the consumption of the mother's resources in the womb]"
-Albert Rosenfeld, "Pushed Out Into a Hostile World," Life Magazine, April 30, 1965, p. 66

"Don't worry about the baby. It's a parasite..."
-Sheri Lynch, Hello My Name is Mommy: The Dysfunctional Girl's Guide to Have a Baby, published Macmillan, 2004, p. 94, ISBN: 9780312318321

"Babies are a Parasite Growing Inside You"
-Chad Chamley, Babies are a Parasite Growing Inside You, Points in Case, pointsincase.com, published Feb 12, 2006, retrieved Dec 22, 2010

Very interesting that evolutionist feminists have referred to their hatred of babies, calling them a "parasite in the woman's body." The Nazis referred to their hatred for the Jews, calling them a "parasite in the body of nations."
(See Ritchie Robertson, The 'Jewish Question' in German Liturature, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 195, ISBN: 9780198186311; See also Louis de Saussure & Peter Schulz, Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005, p. 37, ISBN: 9789027227072)

The pattern of evolutionary thought is passed on in each passing generation, and things are getting worse as they go. Americans typically think they are above and beyond these thoughts and actions, and that only other evil foreign countries have ever committed these crimes, but we have a terrible history of racism, torture, and murder of the Native, African, Asian, and Caucasian Americans alike. All of these actions were justified by people who believed in evolution, and logically applied that philosophy to fit what they see.

feminism: the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men
(See 'feminism', Random House Dictionary, Random House Inc, 2010; See also Collins English Dictionary, 10th Edition, William Collins Sons & Co, 2009)

It always amazes me that a minority of women in the feminist movement have made the majority think they are "supposed" to act in a certain way, when in fact, most women I talk to are AGAINST the feminist movement. Aaron Russo, director and producer of Freedom to Facism and other famous Hollywood Movies (The Rose, Trading Places), came forward in an interview and told the public about a conversation he had with Nicholas Rockafeller, and how the Rockafellers funded the women's lib movement for the purpose of doubling taxation and destroying the family unit.

Section on women's lib starts @ 1:34.

Feminist and Marxist Gloria Steinem has come forward and admitted that Ms Magazine, a leading publication in the feminist movement, had financial backing from the CIA.
(See Dr. Henry Makow, "Gloria Steinem: How the CIA Used Feminism to Destabilize Society," savethemales.ca, published March 18, 2002, retrieved Dec 22, 2010; See also Ernest Millington, Shadow Rulers: The Euro-American Trojan Horse, published iUniverse, 2009, p. 174, ISBN: 9781440122965)

The rising up of women has coincided with the downgrading of men. The boys' toy soldiers, trucks, and guns have been replaced with teletubbies and elmo. Boys are not taught to stand up and defend themselves against the school bully, but rather run away and tell on him. Spankings have been replaced with "time-outs," and we are now almost forced to adhere to the socialist standard of reasoning with a disruptive and out-of-control child. In short, men are not learning the traits of being men, and society is slowly being shifted away from the Bible, and towards a matriarchal rule filled with fear and confusion.

When we see people behind the scenes fighting to destroy the family unit, we have to ask ourselves, why do we have families at all? The answer comes from the original source of families: The Bible.

And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
-Genesis 2:18

And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply...
-Genesis 1:28

However, if evolution is true, why would there be a need for "marriage" and a "family?" Where do those terms come from? For example, why would a man want to just limit himself to one woman if evolution were true? Why would he care whether or not he has offspring or if they live or die? Why would a mother care whether or not she murders (aborts) her baby? The entire concept of breaking down the family unit is an evolutionary-based philosophy, right down to the very idea of rejecting and/or limiting the idea of having children at all.

According to the Bible, abortion is murder. Calling it "abortion" does not make acceptable. Calling a child a "fetus" does not make him non-child.

And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son...
-Genesis 16:11

As many things about evolution, it all starts with a lie. In 1874, evolutionist professor Ernst Haeckel was tried and convicted by Gena University in Austria for lying. Haeckel made charts of fake drawings and traveled around Germany converting people to believing in evolution.

Top: Haeckel's Drawings -- Bottom: Actual Photographs


Haeckel admitted that he lied:

"I should feel utterly condemned and annihilated by this admission, were it not that hundreds of the best observers and most reputable biologists lie under the same charge." -Ernst Haeckel, quoted by George William von Tunzelmann, The Superstition Called Socialism, published Lippincott, 1911, p. 311; See also Richard F. Mould, Mould's Medical Anecdotes Omnibus Edition, CRC Press, 1996, p. 80, ISBN: 9780750303903

In light of this information, it is surprising to note that evolutionists are still teaching this lie, that the embryo in the mother has gill slits, even though it was proven wrong 135 years ago.

You have to lie on your SAT to get into a good college.

Haeckel also held the same patterned philosophical view that we have seen so far in this article:

"The mental life of savages rises little above that of the higher mammals, especially the ages, with which they are genealogically connected... Their intelligence moves within the narrowest bounds, and one can no more (or no less) speak of their reason than of that of the more intelligent animals."
-Ernst H.P.A. Haeckel, Wonders of Life, 1904, p. 58

"These lower races (such as the Veddahs or Australian negroes) are psychologically nearer to the mammals (apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must, therefore, assign a totally different value to their lives."
-Ernst H.P.A. Haeckel, The Wonders of Life: A Popular Study of Biological Philosophy, published Harper & Brothers, 1904, p. 390

Haeckel's lie of gill slits in the embryo is a philosophical idea that teaches students that a child is just a fish, and has not evolved into a human yet, and therefore is not human, and therefore is acceptable to kill if the child is an inconvenience. All based on a lie, the humanist news media gives murderers a positive-sounding term like "PRO-choice," and gives those protecting the lives of children negative-sounding terms like "ANTI-abortion."

This child was gutted like a fish in the womb.

Why is this still being taught? Why do people hold on to such a dumb idea for so long? We could talk for hours about these questions, but anyone truly seeking an answer will find that people use these lies to promote their philosophical ideas that justify their wicked actions. Keith Thomson said it best:

"In seeking to understand why the Haeckelian view persisted so long, we have also to consider the alternatives. Scientists often are highly conservative and will hold to a viewpoint longer than is justified when there is no alternative or, worse, when the logical alternative upsets our worldview."
-Keith Thomson & Linda Thomson, The Common But LEss Frequent Loon and Other Essays, Yale University Press, 1996, p. 146, ISBN: 9780300066548

It amazes me, after all this, that so many women adhere so strongly to such philosophical lies under the disguise of "equal rights," and at the same time usually reject the teachings of scripture, when it is the Bible which upholds the equality of women:

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
-Galations 3:28

Evolution is what upholds the philosophy that women are inferior, as we can see from the writings of Charles Darwin:

"The chief distinction of the intellectual powers of the two sexes in shown by man's attaining to a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can woman--whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If the two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive both of composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison... if men are capable of a decided pre-eminence over woman in many subjects, the average of mental power in man must be above that of woman."
-Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, Digireads.com Publishing, 2009, p. 450, ISBN: 9781420933994

"A married man is a poor slave, worse than a negro."
-Charles Darwin, The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882, reprint by Nora Barlow, published Norton, 1993, p. 234, ISBN: 9780393310696; See also M.L. Johnson, Overcoming Racism Through the Gospel, Xulon Press, 2007, p. 210, ISBN: 9781602663008

The destruction of the family unit weakens a nation. It destroys the masculinity of our men, our wise leaders and strong warriors. It destroys the femininity of our women, our gentle caretakers and guiding teachers. It destroys our children, which will decide the fate of generations to come. All of this destruction stems from the unscientific, religious philosophy of evolution.

"The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next." -Abraham Lincoln, quoted by John W. Chalfant, America: A Call to Greatness, Xulon Press, 2003, p. 166, ISBN: 9781594670916

The race to form a New World Order (one-world government) has been running for decades, and most people in this world have their eyes blinded to it:

"When an opponent declares, 'I will not come over to your side,' I calmly say, 'Your child belongs to us already... What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.'" -Adolf Hitler, speech given Nov 6, 1933, quoted by William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Their Reich: A History of Nazi Germany, published Simon and Schuster, 1990, p. 249, ISBN: 9780671728687

Is communism and a new world order being taught to our children in public schools?
It doesn't matter. Why would it not matter if these things were taught to the next generation? Because it is the worldview that matters. Communism, socialism, and the New World Order can be taught as much as one pleases, but people will never accept it unless they first believe in a worldview which can support those ideas. Evolution is the worldview that supports the ideas of communism and a new world order, so the students must learn that philosophical worldview first, and then the rest will fall in place without resistance.

Ask any teacher or missionary that lives in a communist country what is taught in the public schools, and they will tell you they do not start out teaching the students communism, but rather, they teach them evolution. Make the evolution theory believable to the students, and the worldview will do the rest without any extra effort.

Let's take a journey through the logical process, starting from the foundational philosophy, and traveling through the logical conclusions.

It starts with evolution. The concept of man evolving from animals over millions of years leaves students with the thought that God may not exist if there are "naturalistic" explanations for everything we see around us. Or, they may believe in a "god" that used evolution to get us here, but that thinking still leads them down the path that God is not involved in His creation. Either way, it teaches students to throw off the Bible as mythology, rather than our history. (The god of evolution is not the God of the Bible: Read Christian Ministries Teaching Evolution here at creationliberty.com for more details) Evolution leads to atheism, or a form of agnosticism. Atheists deny the existence of God, and agnostics claim they do not know if God exists or not. As students grow with this thinking of throwing off the Bible as their primary guide, they see suffering, misery, and death, but cannot explain it other than through evolutionary concepts like "survival of the fittest." (Read "Evolution Can't Justify Morals" here at creationliberty.com for more details)

Atheism leads to humanism. A humanist is someone who believes that the values and feelings of humans trumps all other authorities. Humanists mostly reject the concept of god and ultimately believe that humans are the authoritative "gods" of this world and arose to that position via evolution. When seeking an answer, they will look only look inside themselves and other humans, where the answer can never be found.

From the Humanist Manifesto:
"Humans are an integral part of nature, the result of unguided evolutionary change. Humanists recognize nature as self-existing. We accept our life as all and enough..."
"Ethical values are derived from human need and interest as tested by experience. Humanists ground values in human welfare shaped by human circumstances, interests, and concerns and extended to the global ecosystem and beyond..."
(From the American Humanist Association, Humanist Manifesto, 3rd Edition, 2003, www.americanhumanist.org, retrieved Dec 24, 2010)

And the final section of their manifesto shows us exactly what they will work towards:
"Working to benefit society maximizes individual happiness. Progressive cultures have worked to free humanity from the brutalities of mere survival and to reduce suffering, improve society, and develop global community."
(From the American Humanist Association, Humanist Manifesto, 3rd Edition, 2003, www.americanhumanist.org, retrieved Dec 24, 2010)

Humanism leads to socialism. Socialism is basically where you have to have a license (permission) to do anything. Socialism is the form of government developed when God is thrown off and the people expect government to step in prevent all suffering. Humanists not only support this agenda, but some seek to put themselves into a position of power to regulate the people.
Over time, in this system, government is expected to provide all things, protect all things, and is held responsible for all things, which leads us straight into the next system...
(For more details on the socialist movement, see Frederic Bastiat, The Law: The Classic Blueprint for a Free Society, reprint Foundation for Economic Education, Third Edition 2008, ISBN: 978-1-57246-214-4

Socialism leads to communism. When summed up, communism is full socialist control. Once a group of men in government are given full power, communism is inevitable. With the information revolution in full swing as we speak, it takes the press of a button to communicate worldwide, and with that technology, it is easy for communist nations to work together under a one-world rule.

Once a country hits communism, the "elites" who rule the territory start to think on a larger, global scale. How can I draw the conclusions of a New World Order from this? Just look around for the evidence. What do men with fast cars always want? A faster car. What do women with lots of shoes want? More shoes. Even movies, for example, have to have better graphics, more explosions, more blood, more sex, more violence... to appease the masses who always want more. Because the things of this world never satisfy. What do men with power always want? More power!

The New World Order elitists have their plans, and all of them are based on the philosophy of evolution. The elitists of the world are secretive to an extent, but the people are turning a blind eye to what they reveal openly. The Georgia Guidestones, in Elbert County, GA, have the ten commandments for the New World Order listed out on giant stone slabs in 10 languages:
Is there really an effort to decrease the world's population? Based on statements we saw from people like Maragret Sanger, Ernst Haeckel, and Adolf Hitler, is it really so suprising?

"In order to stabilize world populations, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day." -Jacques Cousteau, quoted by Steven W. Mosher, Population Control: Real Costs, Illusory Benefits, Transaction Publishers, 2008, p. 55, ISBN: 9781412807128; See also Nathan Tabor, The Beast on the East River: The U.N. Threat to America's Sovereignty and Security, published Thomas Nelson Inc, 2006, p. 69, ISBN: 9781595550538

"A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." -Ted Turner, quoted by Mark Dice, The New World Order, published Mark Dice, 2010, p. 127, ISBN: 9780967346670; See also Fred Gielow, You Don't Say: Sometimes Liberals Show Their True Colors, published Freedom Books, 1999, p. 189, ISBN: 9780960393824

These men have the evolution-based philosophy, and think that if humans are consuming too many resources, one day we will run out and everyone will die, so for now, it is best that most of them are killed off. Of course, the people who make these statements (e.g. Jacques Cousteau, Ted Turner, etc) believe they are the "enlightened" thinkers that need to survive to rule the left-over population. They get to live, and everyone else should die off. This is all part of the evolutionary "survival of the fittest" philosophy that is being practically applied to world around us.

Joseph Stalin, a strong believer in evolution, wanted to reduce population levels.
(See Ian Dear & Michael R.D. Foot, The Oxford Companion to World War II, Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 821, ISBN: 9780198604464)

Adolf Hitler, a strong believer in evolution, wanted to reduce population levels.
(See Gavriel D. Rosenfeld, The World Hitler Never Made: Alternate History and the Memory of Nazism, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 166, ISBN: 9780521847063)

And there are many humanists today, who are strong believers in evolution, that want to reduce population levels.

"People are the cause of all the problems; we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them..."
-Dr. Charles Wuster, quoted by Jay H. Lehr, Rational Readings on Environmental Concerns, published John Wiley & Sons, 1992, p. 20, ISBN: 9780471284857; See also Paul K. Driessen, "Is the DDT Ban Intended to Control Global Population?" Environment & Climate News, April 1, 2001, retrived from www.heartland.org, Dec 28, 2010

"The world has a cancer, and the cancer is man."
-Alan Gregg, quoted by Mihajlo D. Mesarovic & Eduard Pestel, Mankind at the Turning Point: The Second Report to the Club of Rome, published Hutchinson, 1975, p. 1, ISBN: 9780091234706

"If I were to be reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus, to lower human population levels." -Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, Husband of Queen Elizabeth II, quoted by Jay H. Lehr & Janet K. Lehr, Standard Handbook of Environmental Science, Health, and Technology, published McGraw-Hill Professional, 2000, p. 20.57, ISBN: 9780070383098

Now consider that in order to kill off 95% of the world's population, without having 95% of the world fight back, requires a "New World Order," or one-world government, that can make new laws and enforce them according to what is "best for everyone." However, this is not what is best for everyone, but best for the few elites who are in charge, their families, and those that enforce their ideals... all this made possible with the philosophy of evolution branded in their minds.

---

"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world."

-Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, published D. Appleton & Co, 1871, p. 193

What you believe, determines how you behave.
Take a look at the Columbine shootings, or more specifically, the mainstream media's avoidance of the true reason for Eric & Dylan's actions. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold walked into school with semi-automatic weapons and killed 15 people. In their hunt, they targeted Christians, like Cassie Bernall, and dark-skinned students, like Isaiah Shoels. Eric & Dylan did the shootings on April 20th to commemorate Adolf Hitler's birthday.

"[Eric & Dylan's] clothes may give a clue to the thinking of these teenage murderers. The autopsy report for one of the killers documents that on the day of the tragedy he was wearing black combat boots, a black glove on his right hand, and a white T-shirt with the inscription 'Nature Selection' on the front."
-Denver Rocky Mountain News, June 25, 1999, p. 4a

Eric and Dylan were strong believers in evolution, and what you believe determines how you behave. From Eric's journal:

"NATURAL SELECTION. Kill all retards, people with brain f**k ups... Geeeawd! People spend millions of dollars on saving the lives of retards, and why? I don't buy that s**t like 'oh, he's my son, though!' so the f**k what, he ain't normal, kill him. Put him out of his misery. He is only a waste of time and money."

-Eric Harris from his journal, quoted by Peter Langman, Why Kids Kill: Inside the Minds of School Shooters, published Macmillan, 2010, ISBN: 9780230101487

In this article, we have seen over and over and over again the same destructive pattern the philosophy of evolution leads to. Do all people who believe in evolution think this way? Certainly not. However, this is the practical application of the evolution philosophy, and those evolutionists who would object to these actions do so only from their own opinion, and cannot logically argue against it. In fact, some evolutionists fully believe that if you do not believe in the same philosophy of the people we have looked at in this article, you are stupid, insane, ignorant, and/or wicked:

"It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I’d rather not consider that)."

-Richard Dawkins in an 1989 New York Times review of creationists, quoted by Ray Comfort, Nothing Created Everything: The Scientific Impossibility of Atheistic Evolution, published WND Books, 2009, p. 87, ISBN: 9781935071235; See also William A. Dembski, The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design, InterVarsity Press, 2004, p. 52, ISBN: 9780830832163

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
-Romans 1:22-25

If God is not put in charge of mankind, then mankind must be in charge of himself, and eventually, an "elite" few will take control of everything on the basis of an evil philosophy that is based on no scientific evidence. We, as a country, and as those who follow and believe on Christ and His Salvation, need to stop hacking at the branches, and start attacking the root cause. "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." -Henry David Thoreau, The Portable Thoreau, revised & published Penguin, 1964, ISBN: 9780140150315

The one who strikes at the root is never popular. Most people will make fun of the one striking at the root, ridiculing him/her, but the truth is the truth, no matter how many sticks and stones are thrown. The only answer to this nation is to destroy the lies used to support this false teaching of evolution, and return to God's Word as our source of knowledge and morality.

If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
-2 Corinthians 7:14

It's not time to get worried. It's time to get busy. Let's start working to share the truth in our Lord Jesus Christ.

🔍