Here's this remark: "I don't believe that a God can exist. Prove me the Christian God exists, but without using the issue of evil or morality, since I think everything is permitted and evil does not exist, except as a societal convention of others I need not follow."
[After giving out Transcendental Argument for the existence of God]
Here's another: "If you use the transcendental argument for the existence of God to prove the Christian God of the Bible to exist, how can you justify logic? Why does one need to be logical anyway? Is logic required for everyone?"
"If atheism can't verify science, what about the Christian? Can he verify science?"
If you had to answer the remarks above, how would you do so?
By the way, is the Transcendental Argument for God that Mr. Johnson mentioned in his article not circular reasoning? I know for a fact that quite a number of people call it circular reasoning.