The real problem with the article is that they don't mention B17 because they don't think it exists. They do mention laetrile, but it's not made from "fruit pits," it's made from fruit seeds, and it does not "break down cyanide" in the body, but rather, it provides the body with a healthy form of cyanide and benzaldohyde that is toxic to cancer cells.
A lot of the deception is spoken out of the (willful) ignorance of the author, and also what she doesn't say. For example, she says a natural cure "might be that 50 per cent of people got great benefit from a treatment but if that 50 per cent is two out of four people, it's meaningless," but then conveniently fails to point out that radiation treatment mortality rates have a percentage in the upper 90s. Thus, she effectively disproves her own argument within her own article, but very few people, if any, will catch it.