Much of what I'm going to say here is how I would respond to these things, but I did not do that with her (assuming it's a 'her' because I cannot tell from the letter 'K') because she would not understand.
From your Articles, I perceive you to be honest, sincere & fairly well studied/thorough in your presentations. However,Okay, before continuing, let's address that sentence. This is a very common thing I receive from those who want to argue against me. They start out with a perceived "compliment" in one short sentence to try and warm themselves up to the person, in which they believe I'm going to be flattered in some manner, and then they spend the rest of their letter mostly berating me because they want my writing and audio teachings to match their personal thoughts and feelings. What they do not understand is that I can very easily see through these forms of flattery, and rather than warming themselves to me, I am immediately on guard against them as soon as they say "however," because I know instantly that the first sentence was a lie.
In fact, I can prove to you it is a lie by her own words later. Watch this:
LETTER 1:
"From your Articles, I perceive you to be honest, sincere & fairly well studied"LETTER 2:
"I have not researched your site... you obviously do not really know your Bible. You also have no idea who God's People really are and who they are NOT."If I do not know the Bible, then how can I be "
fairly well studied?" If I have no idea who God's people really are after claiming to be saved and having knowledge of the Word of God, then how can I be "
honest and sincere?" These statements contradict one another, and therefore, the comments she made in the response (after she got angry that I rejected conversation with her) is what she
REALLY wanted to say from the start. I would have had far more respect for her if she had just begun by saying those things. That's why I had no interest in having a detailed conversation with her; it just would have wasted my time. I don't mind going over it with you guys because I know some of you will get some discernment and understanding out of these exchanges.
What likely really happened was that she read some of my articles, or listened to some of the teachings I did on a hot topic she wanted to hear about. Maybe Freemasonry or something like that. After listening to or reading some of it, she realized how much more well-researched and polished it was compared to the normal "conspiracy ministry" sites she had seen; however, there was one big problem for her, and that was that the facts which I listed out in my teachings did not correlate with other things she learned from maybe someone like Alex Jones or others like him, and therefore, her thought was to write a letter in an attempt to stuff as many concepts as possible into one short email to try and get me to change my writing or teachings to match what she wanted to hear, which resulted in her letter being "jumbled," even though she argued it was not.
jumble: to mix in a confused mass; put or throw together without orderI said her letter was jumbled. She insisted that it was not. I'll let you all read and decide for yourself.
She obviously respected me because of the work I did, but she wanted me to be like her. I am still baffled why people think that if they write a letter like this to someone, it will change everything. It changes nothing. I frequently listen to people and get irritated by their willful blindness on certain issues, so you know what I do? I may skip the part so I don't have to listen to their nonsense, I may close their teaching entirely so I don't have to listen to them anymore (because that is my free choice), or I write them a message explaining the problem of
THAT SPECIFIC TOPIC (i.e. not a jumbled letter) and then give references to where they can find more information, and if they don't want to hear, that is their free choice (i.e. I don't write them a response and tell them how ugly or horrible they are); it's not my responsibility to make them hear.
Based on what I have seen from her letters, it sounds to me like she is upset that I have not covered every single topic of everything that is going wrong with this world.
I AM ONE PERSON! I cannot do everything. I know of organizations that have entire teams that cannot do all of that either. Frankly, I have no idea what peoples' expectation of me really are.
Furthermore, it also seems as if she is upset that I spend too much time going over Bible doctrines, and not enough time going over the secret plans of the New World Order, while at the same time, telling me that I don't understand the Bible.
Next, look at the topics she lists out:
New World Order - I have mentioned that before in my audio teachings.
COVID scam - I have mentioned that before in my audio teachings.
Vaccines -
The United Vacci-NationsBilly Graham -
Wolves in Costume: Billy GrahamTraditions of Men in Churchianity - I talk about those things
ALL THE TIME!
501c3 -
501c3: The Devil's ChurchFreemasons and Shriners -
Freemasonry: A Luciferian BeaconThese are just some of the things she mentioned. She could have easily done a keyword search any time in the past two years and found many of these things. Instead, she chose to be lazy and not do any research to find out, and she relied on her ASSUMPTIONS about what I teach and believe, and that is the danger of "conspiracy ministries," in which they rely much more on inference than fact. This is not to say that there is not a New World Order because the fact is that the Georgia Guidestones are factual information on that subject, but everything they do behind closed doors is not fact until we have factual evidence to back it up.
I think some of you might be surprised how open I am to information, but you may have confused that with my skepticism of assumptions and inference, rather than hard evidence. I am not saying I have never made an assumption or inference, nor am I saying I have never made a mistake in that area, but through those mistakes, I have learned to do better.
Most of the people who write me have never written an article teaching or had to put any information out into the open public where they will be held accountable and scrutinized for what they say. Therefore, they do not understand (nor do they tend to care) about such responsibility to get information correct before releasing it, and they instead delude themselves to think their jumbled letters have value.
"I do not know what you think about Zionism"I have no idea what she's talking about, and frankly, I don't care. I have heard the term, and I think I looked it up one time, perhaps a few years ago, and I did not pay any attention to it, nor made any effort to memorize it, which means it was probably nonsense that I did not want to waste my time on. I don't find any listings for "Zionism" in Scripture, so I don't really care. If she wants to carry a "don't believe in Zionism" message to people, that's fine. I have work to do, and I'm going to get back to it.
If you guys have any other comments, feel free to post them below.