Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jeanne

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 54
1
What's New @ CLE / Re: (WEEKLY TEACHING) Wolves in Costume: Kent Hovind p19
« on: September 13, 2022, 02:14:19 AM »
Just to let you know, the title of this video on Rumble says Part 18. And by the way, dba stands for 'doing business as'.

2
Bible Discussion / When Did Daniel's 70 Weeks Begin?
« on: August 03, 2022, 09:58:04 PM »
I have recently reread the article entitled The Beginner's Guide To Christian Rapture on the CLE website. This article states:

Many of the problems people have had with the 490-year timeline is the date when the construction of the temple actually began because it is presumed that construction began under Darius I (reigned 522-486 BC), but it makes more sense that the construction began soon (i.e. six years) after Darius II (reigned 423-404 BC) began his rule.

However, this is when the temple was actually finished. The book of Ezra tells us that the foundation was laid during the reign of Cyrus, who made the decree to rebuild the temple, (Ezra 3:8-11) and that it was finished during the reign of Darius II.

Ezra 6:14 And the elders of the Jews builded, and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they builded, and finished it, according to the commandment of the God of Israel, and according to the commandment of Cyrus, and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia. 15 And this house was finished on the third day of the month Adar, which was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius the king.

Now, Daniel actually says this:

Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. 25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalemunto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

This suggests to me that the rebuilding of the city of Jerusalem began AFTER the temple was finished. However:

Ezra chapter 4 tells us that the enemies of Judah and Benjamin did all they could to hinder the building that was going on, and they finally wrote a letter to Artaxerxes who, in turn, wrote a decree to stop the building of the city, but not the temple (Ezra 7).

Nehemiah was the cup bearer to Artaxerxes, and he got permission from the king to rebuild the city, so the question remains as to what exactly is meant by 'the going forth of the commandment.' I agree that it makes the most sense for Daniel's 70 weeks to be an unbroken period of 490 years, but I'm just trying to reconcile that timeline with what the Bible actually says about when the building was started and completed, both for the temple and the city.

I'm in a Bible study group with someone who believes and teaches that Daniel's 70th week is yet to happen, and I want to be able to show biblically that this can't be true.

3
General Discussion / Roe v. Wade: Why Now?
« on: June 27, 2022, 07:56:09 AM »
I just read a fascinating article, very well-written and thought out that explains the real agenda behind the overturning of Roe v. Wade, and why they waited until now to do it.

We all know that the globalist agenda has been for depopulation for a very long time now, so why the sudden overturning of Roe v. Wade now, after all this time? According to this author[ they had to wait until now, when the majority of people of child-bearing age have been injected with multiple doses of sterilising 'vaccines'. So now, the next thing is to discourage ALL intimate contact between people, to make sure people continue to live in isolation, interacting only with digital technology.

As we've already seen, this SCOTUS decision has sparked even more massive divisions in society than seen previously, and that is precisely what they wanted. And all this is just the tip of the iceberg...

4
Hi Jeanne

Under Brave or any other browser, go Save As (under the menu of options) and choose Web Page Complete, and it saves the whole web page for offline viewing.  It's a good feature that I use every now and then.

Thanks, Kevin!

5
Kevin, how do you save a web page as an HTML file?

6
Another way of saving articles to your computer is to just copy the whole thing into a Word doc. In most cases, you should be able to copy the whole article/book at one time. I know I was able to do this with the latest version of the Christmas book, and that ended up being 186 pages. I think some of the later versions of Word (and maybe the free word processing programs like Libre or OpenOffice) might have an option to save the document as a PDF, though I've never done it.

One of the things I like about reading a Word doc as opposed to reading on the website is that I can enlarge it to make it easier to read. My eyesight isn't what it used to be...

7
What's New @ CLE / Re: (BOOK) False Prophet Profiles: Kim Clement
« on: June 06, 2022, 01:03:42 AM »
Still reading this book, but I just came across this passage:

'Furthermore, crucifixion typically ended with the guards breaking the legs of the crucified to make it easier to remove their dead bodies from the cross.'

This was not the reason the legs were broken. When a person hung on the cross, his body would sag, and he would have to push himself up with his feet in order to breathe. Therefore, if the guards wanted the person to die quicker, they would break the legs to prevent him from being able to breathe.

John 19:31 The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away. 32 Then came the soldiers, and brake the legs of the first, and of the other which was crucified with him. 33 But when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they brake not his legs:

8
What's New @ CLE / Re: (SOCIAL MEDIA) Truth Social
« on: May 17, 2022, 09:57:18 PM »
I just got an account, too (@Jeanne71957), although I had to switch my VPN to the US to do it, as they still aren't letting people overseas access it.

9
What's New @ CLE / Re: (BOOK) False Prophet Profiles: Kim Clement
« on: May 17, 2022, 09:53:45 AM »
Wasn't there a reference in the HRC emails somewhere to the $65k worth of 'hot dogs' for the White House?

10
General Discussion / Re: Thankful
« on: April 24, 2022, 08:10:48 PM »
Don, I, too, have to wonder what your purpose was/is in coming here. Your introductory post reads more like an application for employment than the testimony of a born again Christian seeking fellowship with likeminded believers, and you don't want to discuss legitimate concerns that have been brought up. Nobody here is interested in arguing with you; rather we want to make certain that you have the same understanding of repentance and conversion that we do before just accepting your word that you are 'brethren' according to the Word of God. Maybe, with all the positions you have held in various church buildings, you are unaccustomed to having your word or authority questioned, but you will quickly find that that is not the way we operate here. So far, I have not seen evidence of the humility of someone who has recognised their worthlessness as a sinner without the grace and mercy of Jesus Christ. As Ellie stated in the other thread, nobody cares about the various positions you have held in whatever church buildings you have attended, or how many degrees your wife has. All we care about is your personal testimony about how and when you came to be born again in Jesus Christ.

11
Bible Discussion / Re: When Is Noncompliance Right in God's Sight?
« on: April 21, 2022, 08:17:44 AM »
Chris wrote a fairly extensive article on this subject, too:

http://creationliberty.com/articles/romans13.php

12
Introduce Yourself / Re: Kevin (Anvilhauler's) Testimony
« on: April 09, 2022, 06:49:35 AM »
I'm in a lot of pain and feeling very ill.  I'll get back when I can.

So sorry to hear that, Kevin. I'm praying for you!

13
Introduce Yourself / Re: Kevin (Anvilhauler's) Testimony
« on: April 05, 2022, 06:32:43 AM »
That was a very good read, Kevin! I knew part of your story, but it was very enjoyable to read all the details. I’m so glad you found us here, and I have greatly enjoyed our friendly debates, and all the lighthearted bantering, too. But most of all, I’ve enjoyed our serious discussions on Scripture.

14
Thanks, Rowan! I always enjoy reading the insights the Lord has shown you in Scripture. Even though your posts are often quite lengthy, they are always worth the read!

15
Wild Emails @ CLE / Re: Pastor Extorting For Money (Chad Wagner)
« on: March 11, 2022, 05:21:10 AM »
So it basically comes back to Calvinists do not want to believe that God has given men the liberty to choose for themselves. Why that is such an egregious thought to them is the real question. If we get to bottom of that, then we also get to the bottom of why they teach such nonsense, and will know better how to answer them.

If a man has full liberty to choose whether to believe the Gospel or not, his fate is in his own hands and he alone has full responsibility for his ultimate fate. On the other hand, if God has already chosen who is to be saved and who is not, then God is the one responsible. I think it all comes down to avoiding responsibility.

I could be wrong about this, but that seems logical to me...

16
General Discussion / Re: Worldwide flood
« on: January 08, 2022, 09:52:45 AM »
This scripture alone should make it obvious to everyone that the flood covered the WHOLE earth:

Genesis 7:19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. 20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered. 21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: 22 all in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.

If the flood was only local, there would have been no need for Noah to take two of every kind of animal on board the ark to preserve them. I could be wrong, but I also believe there was only one continent/land mass before the flood, and that it was the seismic/tectonic activity which broke this up into multiple land masses, such as when Genesis describes 'the fountains of the great deep (were) opened up' (Genesis 7:11)

I also believe that the descriptions of behemoth and leviathan in Job are talking about dinosaurs. There are many other pieces of evidence that man co-existed with dinosaurs, both before and after the flood. Ancient peoples called these creatures dragons. The Native American thunderbird could have been based on the pterodactyl.

Chris wrote an article about what he thinks the pre-flood world could have been like, but of course, as with any piece of literature describing that world, it is all conjecture.

http://creationliberty.com/articles/preflood.php

17
Introduce Yourself / Re: Hi
« on: December 27, 2021, 10:57:05 AM »
Hi Anna, and welcome from me, too! I enjoyed reading your testimony very much and look forward to talking with you more. I'm very glad you found us here, and hope you find the fellowship you've been looking for.

18
General Discussion / Re: Exposing a Woman Named 'Madonna'
« on: December 23, 2021, 05:57:27 AM »
This is the Skype conversation Chris was referring to when he said Madonna was posting a bunch of random Scriptures with no context:

13 December, 2020

Madonna, 12:34 AM
(Philippians 1:15-20) "Some indeed preach Christ even of envy and strife; and some also of good will:  {16} The one preach Christ of contention, not sincerely, supposing to add affliction to my bonds:  {17} But the other of love, knowing that I am set for the defence of the gospel.  {18} What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice.  {19} For I know that this shall turn to my salvation through your prayer, and the supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ,  {20} According to my earnest expectation and my hope, that in nothing I shall be ashamed, but that with all boldness, as always, so now also Christ shall be magnified in my body, whether it be by life, or by death."

Madonna, 12:45 AM
5When a man hath taken a new wife, he shall not go out to war, neither shall he be charged with any business: but he shall be free at home one year, and shall cheer up his wife which he hath taken.

Madonna, 12:51 AM
(Matthew 19:19) "Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."

Timothy, 12:51 AM
Are there people on a call today? I’m not understanding why you’re posting those Scriptures.

Madonna, 12:56 AM
No people; I just was lead by my Lord to exhort the church with God word.

Timothy, 12:58 AM
But in what context are you posting those verses at random like that? That doesn’t make sense. You’re not explaining who they are directed to or why.

Madonna, 12:59 AM
(Mark 9:42) "And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea."

Timothy, 1:03 AM
Posting random verses like that is not exhortation. Exhortation requires explanation of how they apply to something and encouraging people to do a certain thing. Anyone here can open their Bibles at random and be “exhorted” with your method. But real exhortation requires understanding of the matter. So why are you posting these verses?

Madonna, 1:06 AM
(Matthew 23:23-24) "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.  {24} Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel."

Jeanne 1:07 AM
Madonna, are you reading anything Timothy has said?

Timothy, 1:07 AM
Is there something I’m doing wrong Madonna? You need to explain yourself.

Madonna, 1:14 AM
Isn't it alright to post God word if it doesn't apply to you then you are at liberty to to reject it.

Timothy, 1:15 AM
I never said it was wrong. I was just asking why.

Jeanne 1:15 AM
Just like in the forum, Madonna, posting random scriptures with no explanation serves no discernible purpose

Timothy, 1:16 AM
I don’t understand why you’re getting so upset about it Madonna.

Jeanne 1:16 AM
If you want to post scripture, that's fine, but you should explain WHY you are posting it

Madonna, 1:19 AM
 :)
(Galatians 5:1) "Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage."

Timothy, 1:23 AM
Madonna. This is ridiculous coming from you. You should know better than to act this way. You need to explain why you’re posting this and reasoning with whoever you have a problem with. This is not imparting wisdom to anyone if you don’t explain clearly what it is you’re doing and I’m seeing a lot of pride in your responses right now.

Madonna, 1:23 AM
If God is speaking though thee scripture then examine one heart if and stand in one liberty. I am not upset with anything.

I'm simply sharing god"s word .

Timothy, 1:26 AM
I disagree. You do have a problem and you’re not explaining what it is. This is your prideful heart I’m starting to see that you are posting these verses in response to me and Jeanne accusing us of something while saying you have no problem with anyone. I’m seeing pride and lies coming from you right now and this has got to stop.

Jeanne 1:26 AM
You're not making any sense, Madonna, Again; WHY ARE YOU POSTING ALL THIS while completely ignoring anything Timothy or I have said?

Timothy, 1:29 AM
This is also an example of murmuring by giving a complaint without being completely open about it. In other words you’re suppressing the complaint you made when you responded with Matthew 23. That verse was clearly directed towards Jeanne and I.

Jeanne 1:29 AM
Please explain why you have 'felt led' to post all this. This would not be tolerated in the forum, so what makes you think it's okay to do it here?

Madonna, 1:30 AM
none of these verse is directed to anyone

Jeanne 1:30 AM
Then why are you posting them with no explanation?
This is called 'Skype chat' because it's for CONVERSATION. What you're doing, Madonna, is not conversation; it's just distraction at this point.

Madonna, 1:40 AM
Their are situations that needs to have God word apply without calling any one person  to task God word can convict us ; I need these exhorting as well anyone,

Jeanne 1:49 AM
EXHORT', verb transitive egzhort'. [Latin exhortor; ex and hortor, to encourage, to embolden, to cheer, to advise. The primary sense seems to be to excite or to give strength, spirit or courage.]

1. To incite by words or advice; to animate or urge by arguments to a good deed or to any laudable conduct or course of action.

I exhort you to be of good cheer. Acts 27:22.

Young men also exhort to be sober minded.

EXHORT servants to be obedient to their masters. Titus 2:6.

2. To advise; to warn; to caution.

3. To incite or stimulate to exertion.

EXHORT', verb intransitive To deliver exhortation; to use words or arguments to incite to good deeds.

And with many other words did he testify and exhort Acts 2:40.
Please explain how what you are doing fits with the definition of exhortation, Madonna.

Timothy, 1:50 AM
You need to stop dodging the matter, Madonna. The Holy Spirit doesn’t give understanding by randomly giving verses. We are taught and exhorted with understanding of the verses not only by the context, but in the application of those verses as well. You need to explain the specific reason you’re posting these, to whom it applies and why. Randomly going by what you “felt” is good is being led by your own heart on this matter, not the Holy Spirit.

Proverbs 28:26 He that trusteth in his own heart is a fool: but whoso walketh wisely, he shall be delivered.

You’re doing this foolishly especially since you’re not being reasonable in what little explanation you’re giving because your explanation makes no sense to anyone. Again, with your method of “exhortation”, any of us can randomly open our Bibles, read a verse and have a fuzzy feeling about it. But the understanding of those verses comes from explanation of them and how they apply. I don’t see the Holy Spirit operating that way that makes no sense to the church.

Jeanne 1:54 AM
From what I've heard from Josh and Steve, I get the impression that not everything was all rainbows and sunshine while everyone was in Indiana. I don't have a clue as to what any of that is all about, since I wasn't there and didn't have Internet access for most of the time that was going on, but if all this has anything to do with any of that, then it's making no sense to me.
To be clear, neither of those guys mentioned any names or specifics; they just said the church needs prayer. I don't know what about...

Dee, 5:13 AM
Church family, let's move on from this. Each of us ought to examine ourself.  If we are not forgiving, that is a sin.

We are holding on to our hurts, even though all of us were sorry and then we all hugged. Let's pray the Lord will help us with the forgiveness., and ask the Lord to give each of us healing from these and all hurts from our past.
So we can have joy and God’s Peace, and move forward.

Let us be thankful to have found each other; it's hard to find true Christians.
(Josh and i have walked miles evangelizing, and have found none.)

We've got to be kind, love each other, and forgive each other…
as God loves us, and as He forgives us.

Philippians 3:13
“Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before,”

Jeanne 5:17 AM
Dee, I was just confused as to why Madonna was posting all those scriptures. I didn't know if it had anything to do with any of the stuff that happened or not. But the point was, whether it did or didn't, she needed to explain what she was posting and why.

Dee, 5:58 AM
Madonna was exiting the church and was posting scriptures for us.  She explained that the people who read it will understand.  She has kindness and love towards you all.
But you were unkind to her.  These were all scriptures she wanted to post, but she kept being interrupted before she could get all the verses posted.  The Holy Spirit is a gentle Spirit.  Examine yourselves.  Do you have the Holy Spirit in you?  Are you gentle, kind?  Our sister has been spoken to in a most unkind way.  There is nothing wrong with sharing God's Word.  Let it speak to us who would receive it.  I didn't know there's "rules" on how to share God's Word.   edited 9:17 pm PT (I read the original post before she edited it, and it looks a lot 'nicer' now than what she originally wrote. However, since this was over a year ago, I can't remember now what she did say at first.)

Jeanne 6:04 AM
Posting things like that in one of the small group chats is one thing, but when the whole church is involved, the same rules apply here as on the forum. We've had to rebuke many people there for posting random scriptures with no explanation or context, and Madonna ignored my and Tim's requests to provide such explanation and just kept posting. So yes, the rebuke was necessary.

Dee, 6:06 AM
You speak unkindly.  That is not of God.

Tonya, 6:34 AM
This needs to stop. Madonna was rightfully repute for posting scripture with no context. Dee, you know I care about you and sometimes rebuke has to be sharp. I know you don’t like it when you think people are being unkind, but it is actually kind to give people sharp rebuke sometimes.

I think everybody needs to stop and take a deep breath. We should all be examining ourselves carefully. I include myself in that.

This is the kind of thing Chris was talking about on Wednesday for those of you that were there. We all need to make sure we are doing what is right.

Ellie, 6:37 AM
I didn’t want to say anything because I am new here but I’m a little concerned about what is going on. I personally was confused about the verses that Madonna was posting and before anyone even responded I was wondering if I should ask her what it was about because I thought that maybe she was on a call and accidentally sending verses to the chat with the whole church. The verses she sent are good in their context and I think with some explanation maybe it would have been helpful. I’m not upset with her for it, but i can speak for myself in saying that i was personally kind of confused about it and it didn’t make sense to me what the correlation was between the verses she was sending before anyone even responded yet. First the verse about preaching Christ of envy and strife, then a verse about a man taking a new wife, and then the verse about honoring thy father and mother. These were all before anyone responded and when I read them I was just confused about what the reason was. They’re all good verses, but I think it’s reasonable that Jeanne and Tim wanted to know what the purpose was and then going on to explain the meaning of exhortation. I don’t think there is anything wrong with sharing Bible verses, but all I’m saying is that it is reasonable to give some sort of explanation for why those specific verses were chosen or what was gleaned from them in her personal study. Otherwise it’s easy for people to become confused. And it seems out of the people who have responded, at least a few people were confused by it including myself and just wanted some clarification about what the purpose was in sending those ones.

Sometimes it’s hard to have these kinds of conversations over a chat because the “tone” can be misinterpreted when just speaking directly about things. I think that’s important to take note of when evaluating what happened today and what was said. I hope it’s okay for me to say this and I’m not out of line in anything.

Jeanne 6:42 AM
Ellie, you're not out of line at all. There were several people who were confused by what Madonna was posting and, as we all know, God is not the author of confusion.

Ellie, 6:45 AM
And I don’t even want it to seem like anyone is ganging up on Madonna or anything because I don’t feel that way at all and I am not trying to do that to her in the slightest. I only wanted to say something because I don’t want this sort of conflict to happen (as I’m sure none of us truly want it) and I just hope that there can be understanding between everyone and that it can be resolved peaceably through proper communication, self examination, and patience on everyone’s part.

END CONVERSATION

As has already been stated, what Ellie hoped for in the last paragraph did NOT happen. Madonna left and took five other people with her. What those people are doing now and where they are getting their teaching from is anybody's guess. There was a new member who came on the forum a few weeks ago, and actually joined the church, but she also left after being contacted by Madonna and believing her lies, and she would not discuss it with the rest of the church, either.






19
General Discussion / Re: Help finding: Biblically sound music
« on: December 23, 2021, 04:14:50 AM »
If you haven't already, I suggest you read Chris' article on CCM

http://creationliberty.com/articles/music.php

Lots of good info in this one!

20
General Discussion / What Is The Metaverse?
« on: November 13, 2021, 10:04:35 PM »
Chris mentioned something about not having ever gotten involved with VR (virtual reality) when talking about FB changing their name to Meta, and I wondered at the time what one had to do with the other, but I really didn't pay much attention to it. However, I found this video recently in one of my other Telegram groups, and it really opened my eyes to what is truly going on here.

A couple of disclaimers, however. I don't believe for a second that the guy who did this video is actually a Christian. I think he's in some sort of Hebrew Roots cult or something, because he refers to God as 'Yah" and to Jesus as 'Yeshua'. And I couldn't even find what sort of 'Bible' he's using because typing in the phrasing used in the verses he quoted didn't bring up a match. I just kept getting other popular versions. I even looked up his website, but he uses the NKJV there.

Anyway, the poor theology aside, he does do a good job of explaining what the Metaverse is and why it is so dangerous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDM1CIwa5Bw

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 54