I'd also like to point out something you guys may have missed to show that he was actually quite similar to Fred in passive aggressiveness. I know, some of you might be thinking that he was more open aggressive, but there was some passiveness (i.e. murmuring) in there as well.
If Dee wants to know where he started getting angry, it's when I posted this, which he did not initially respond to (i.e. you will find no response on the forum to my point here):
http://www.creationliberty.com/forum/index.php?topic=531.msg4080#msg4080 (https://http://www.creationliberty.com/forum/index.php?topic=531.msg4080#msg4080)
"This pattern from Wynand of posting one sentence or just a few words needs to stop. This isn't twitter. This isn't social media. This is a place where we have discussions. In addition, in this particular instance, Dee was correct in her response in which Wynand was claiming a doctrine was "not Scriptural," when in fact, it is. I think Wynand needs to start putting a bridal on the tongue; not to say that he cannot talk, as I'm glad to have his conversation with us, but that he should consider what he's saying and doing because this forum isn't a twitter feed."
I was requesting that he discuss matters fully, instead of writing quick one-line posts all the time because it wasn't doing any good for him or anyone else, and we were starting to waste a lot of our time having to ask him what he was talking about over and over. Remember when we told Fred that we are not brethren with him, and he would purposefully start out calling us "Brothers and Sisters?" In other words, he's stating the opposite with a contentious heart instead of explaining himself clearly; it's a rebelliousness against the truth in a sideways manner, acting like his rage isn't clearly seen. In the email Wynand sent me, you'll notice he said:
"Enjoy your social media I will read my bible"
He thinks no one would see his back-handed slap, and also, his anger is so hot, he's just saying things without even thinking about them, further demonstrating that he needs a bridle on his tongue, to which, I forgot to give him the Scripture on that, and he might have a hard time "keyword-searching" it because I spelled 'bridle' wrong in my first post to him about it:
If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.
-James 1:26
I'd also like to point out something you guys may have missed to show that he was actually quite similar to Fred in passive aggressiveness. I know, some of you might be thinking that he was more open aggressive, but there was some passiveness (i.e. murmuring) in there as well.
If Dee wants to know where he started getting angry, it's when I posted this, which he did not initially respond to (i.e. you will find no response on the forum to my point here):
http://www.creationliberty.com/forum/index.php?topic=531.msg4080#msg4080 (https://http://www.creationliberty.com/forum/index.php?topic=531.msg4080#msg4080)
"This pattern from Wynand of posting one sentence or just a few words needs to stop. This isn't twitter. This isn't social media. This is a place where we have discussions. In addition, in this particular instance, Dee was correct in her response in which Wynand was claiming a doctrine was "not Scriptural," when in fact, it is. I think Wynand needs to start putting a bridal on the tongue; not to say that he cannot talk, as I'm glad to have his conversation with us, but that he should consider what he's saying and doing because this forum isn't a twitter feed."
I was requesting that he discuss matters fully, instead of writing quick one-line posts all the time because it wasn't doing any good for him or anyone else, and we were starting to waste a lot of our time having to ask him what he was talking about over and over. Remember when we told Fred that we are not brethren with him, and he would purposefully start out calling us "Brothers and Sisters?" In other words, he's stating the opposite with a contentious heart instead of explaining himself clearly; it's a rebelliousness against the truth in a sideways manner, acting like his rage isn't clearly seen. In the email Wynand sent me, you'll notice he said:
"Enjoy your social media I will read my bible"
He thinks no one would see his back-handed slap, and also, his anger is so hot, he's just saying things without even thinking about them, further demonstrating that he needs a bridle on his tongue, to which, I forgot to give him the Scripture on that, and he might have a hard time "keyword-searching" it because I spelled 'bridle' wrong in my first post to him about it:
If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.
-James 1:26
I was thinking that too Chris! I, unfortunately, tend to shy away from "angry" sounding people. I struggle with that. Thank you for posting his emails. I am glad to see exactly what type of person he is and glad he is banned.