CLE Forum
CLE Website and Ministry => What's New @ CLE => Topic started by: creationliberty on October 30, 2020, 04:11:26 PM
-
My Notes on the Book of 2nd Corinthians: Chapters 1-5 (https://http://creationliberty.com/articles/book2corinthians01.php)
(https://http://creationliberty.com/images/book2corinthians01.jpg)
-
My Notes on the Book of 2nd Corinthians: Chapters 1-5 (https://http://creationliberty.com/articles/book2corinthians01.php)
A minor problem but the Introduction lists it as your personal studies in the Book of First Corinthians.
I hope all goes well with the computer repairs too.
-
I did not notice your post until now. I just fixed that.
-
Hi Chris
While doing the computers for the at risk youths I also picked up a minor error in the Audio listings
Study #0044 [June 29, 2014]
1st Half--Scripture reading from Rebuking a New-Age Ministry
2nd Half--Rebuking a New-Age Ministry
-
That's not an error, Kevin. The whole 2 hours was devoted to that conversation, so there was no first half Bible reading.
-
That's not an error, Kevin. The whole 2 hours was devoted to that conversation, so there was no first half Bible reading.
:) Hi Jeanne
It was a minor error and Chris altered it. For the first half it had it listed as "Scripture reading from Rebuking a New-Age Ministry" but both halves are just "Rebuking a New-Age Ministry". I haven't listened to that one again recently but there might not even be a break part way through so the whole teaching could quite easily have been listed as "Rebuking a New-Age Ministry".
It was at Chris' discretion if he wanted to change it or not but because the computers are for youths and I also give out "business cards" I would be a bit gutted if someone was put off by an error like that. I might feel that way more than others though because I often have to read documentation for my job and when I pick up errors I lose a lot of confidence in what I'm reading. And sometimes documentation is so totally wrong I know that who wrote it didn't even proof read it and I waste a great deal of time until I realise the documentation is incorrect and I have to figure out what is correct ...... without introducing new errors or causing thousands of dollars of damage to equipment. The "Rebuking a New-Age Ministry" was nowhere near as bad as that but if something is easy to change it can make it more pleasing for the reader :)
-
I totally agree with you, Kevin. That's why I proofread all of Chris' articles and send him corrections. Spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors drive me nuts and, at least as far as I'm concerned, when I see them on websites and/or news articles, the whole thing loses credibility. It blows my mind how Chris can write everything in HTML, as he's doing the articles, though!